3. Parties withdrawing a benefit must return to the other party or be compensated if the contract is cancelled. 1. The contract is cancelled under paragraph 56, paragraph 2. In this section, it is stated that any contract that prevents a party from asserting its right to legal proceedings or which, at the end of a certain period of time, limits the person to a judicial proceeding, must be considered non-acute. The right of appeal is not within the jurisdiction of this section. In this section, it is stated that if the consideration or objective of the contract is totally or partially illegal, the agreement must be considered inconclusive. The working philosophy underlying this section is that if the illegal clause can be dissociated from the contract, then the whole contract is not considered invalid, but only the illegal part is considered invalid and the rest of the contract is considered valid, but if the illegal clause cannot be dissociated from the legal part , then the entire contract is considered illegal.  „Is done“ are not considered equivalent to „expressed to be done.“ So if an agreement contains no indication of love and affection, then the court will check the evidence in court to verify the same whether the provision was made of love and affection or not. A contract may be invalidated even if a change in legislation or regulation occurs after an agreement has been reached, but before the contract is carried out, if the legal activities previously described in the document are now considered illegal. The words „to the extent“ in the section 27 provisions are very important.
These words illustrate the position of a situation in which the agreement can be divided into parts. If the agreement can be divided into parts and some of these parties are not affected by the provisions of this section, i.e. they are not challenged as trade restrictions, the agreement on these parties remains in force. However, if the agreement is not divisible, the entire agreement is cancelled. An important point in this regard is to remember it. If one party is aware of the impossibility of benefit and enters into an agreement with the other party, the other party will be entitled to compensation for the loss or injury it has suffered. Such an agreement boils down to fraud, as discussed on page 17 of the act. For example, A knew that the wood for which he made a sale agreement to B had already been destroyed by fire, so his agreement with B was not covered by this section, but by the S.17 of the law. Another good example is example (c) of S.56, where A prohibits marriage contracts with B, already married to C and subject to polygamy by the law of which he is subject. A must be compensated B for the loss it suffered as a result of non-fulfilling the promise.
The contract may also be considered inconclusive if an illegal object or object at hand is involved in the agreement. It may be a promise of sex, an illegal substance or something else that causes one or both parties to break the law. In this section, it is said that any ambiguous or ambiguous agreement whose meaning cannot be certain must be considered inconclusive.